First, why would a journalist call a 14 year old girl a "woman"?
Second, AP has already been put on notice that folks were a bit concerned about their calling a 14 year old girl a "woman" - so why are they still doing it?
Third, calling a 14 year old rape victim a "woman" even further trivializes the crime - not because raping "women" is somehow less offensive okay, but rather because raping children is even more offensive.
So the question remains, knowing all of this, why would the Associated Press continue to use language in their story that is incorrect, misleading, and lessens the gravity of the true offense?
Because the perpetrator was a US soldier, perhaps? Or because the victim was only some lowly Iraqi, and when they're raped, it's really only 3/5ths a rape?
Technical Ball Brushing
-
Ann Althouse, casting asparagus as best she can upon Bobo Brooks' sordid
tale of GOP senatorial thigh stroking:
Perhaps the Republican Senator just period...
3 hours ago




