AMERICAblog.com

Visit our stores
here and here

You are NOT on the AMERICAblog home page
click here to go there!

Check to have links open new windows
Send me your tips: americablog@starpower.net




Friday, March 23, 2007
The miltary regs forbid Bush using our troops as political props

by · 3/23/2007 03:11:00 PM ET · Link 
Discuss this post here: Make a comment · reddit · FARK · Digg It!


The DOD regulations make clear that the White House cannot use uniformed military, active duty or veterans, as props in political events. But that's what Bush did today when he used current or former troops in uniform as window dressing for his political press conference attacking the Democrats as un-American. Is this now the official policy of the US military, that Democrats don't support the troops? What are we, a banana republic now?

Let me quote the relevant regulations...

Regarding active duty troops
It is DoD policy that:

3.1. The wearing of the uniform by members of the Armed Forces (including retired members and members of Reserve components) is prohibited under any of the following circumstances:

3.1.1. At any meeting or demonstration that is a function of, or sponsored by an organization, association, movement, group, or combination of persons that the Attorney General of the United States has designated, under Executive Order 10450 as amended (reference (c)), as totalitarian, fascist, communist, or subversive, or as having adopted a policy of advocating or approving the commission of acts of force or violence to deny others their rights under the Constitution of the United States, or as seeking to alter the form of Government of the United States by unconstitutional means.

3.1.2. During or in connection with furthering political activities, private employment or commercial interests, when an inference of official sponsorship for the activity or interest may be drawn.

3.1.3. Except when authorized by the approval authorities in subparagraph 4.1.1., when participating in activities such as unofficial public speeches, interviews, picket lines, marches, rallies or any public demonstration, which may imply Service sanction of the cause for which the demonstration or activity is conducted.
And regarding retired vets:
3.2. Former members of the Armed Forces, unless under another provision of this Instruction or
under the terms of Section 772 of title 10, United States Code (reference (d)), who served honorably during a declared or undeclared war and whose most recent service was terminated under honorable conditions may wear the uniform in the highest grade held during such war service only on the following occasions and in the course of travel incident thereto:

3.2.1. Military funerals, memorial services, weddings, and inaugurals.

3.2.2. Parades on National or State holidays; or other parades or ceremonies of a patriotic character in which any Active or Reserve United States military unit is taking part.

3.2.3. Wearing of the uniform or any part thereof at any other time or for any other purposes is prohibited.

3.3. Medal of Honor holders may wear the uniform at their pleasure except under the circumstances set forth in paragraph 3.1., above.
So, no one can wear the uniforms at political events, which this most certainly was, vets can't wear them at anything short of funerals, weddings and parades, and medal of honor winners can wear them at more events, but still not at political events, which this was.

But and the Republicans only like our veterans when they can use them, and when they have 4 limbs.

Labels: ,



You are NOT on the AMERICAblog home page, 
click here to read more posts about US Politics















News sites:
- Washington Post
- NYT
- AP Politics
- Reuters Politics
- Editor & Publisher
- Rasmussen Polls
- Time
- Newsweek
- Roll Call
- The Hill

- ABCNews
- Bloomberg Politics
- Boston Globe
- CBS News
- Chicago Sun-Times
- Chicago Tribune
- Christian Science Monitor
- CNN
- Congressional Quarterly
- Dallas Morning News
- Dow Jones
- Houston Chronicle
- Los Angeles Times
- McClatchy
- Miami Herald
- NBC News
- NY Daily News
- New Republic
- NY Daily News blog
- NYT listing of blogs
- New Yorker
- NPR
- Philly Daily News
- Philly Inquirer
- SF Chronicle
- USA Today
- Vanity Fair
- Village Voice

Foreign
- Agence France-Presse
- Al Jazeera
- Asia Times
- BBC
- Der Spiegel (Germany, in English)
- Economist
- Financial Times
- Guardian (UK)
- Haaretz (Israel)
- Independent (UK)
- International Herald Tribune
- Jerusalem Post
- Le Monde (in French)
- Le Monde Diplomatique (in English)
- Times of India
- Times of London
- Yahoo, World News (in French)
- Yahoo, Latin American News (in Spanish)

Opinion
- Jonathan Alter
- Eric Boehlert
- Eleanor Clift
- Joe Conason
- E.J. Dionne, Jr.
- Maureen Dowd
- Dan Froomkin
- Mark Morford
- Frank Rich
- Helen Thomas

Political Cartoons
- Daryl Cagle
- Jeff Danziger
- Doonesbury
- Mark Fiore
- Mike Luckovich
- Pat Oliphant
- Ted Rall
- Tom Toles

Gossip
- Defamer
- Gawker
- Liz Smith
- Page Six
- Perez Hilton
- Reliable Source (Wash Post)
- Wonkette
- Yahoo Celebrity News


Donate to
AMERICAblog Candidates
Scott Kleeb (NE-Senate)
Donna Edwards (MD-04)
Tom Allen (ME-Senate)
Rick Noriega (TX-Senate)



AMERICAblog on Facebook

Buy an ad on all the top liberal blogs at once, over 2 million page views daily, here.

The anti-spam service I use and recommend:






Give to AMERICAblog

One-time donation
$
Recurring monthly donation
$
Donations are not tax-deductible.

Why AMERICAblog?
Because at some point you tire of the lies.

What issues do you cover?
US politics overall with a particular focus on the Bush Administration, the radical right, and civil rights.

Who are you?
- John Aravosis, Washington, DC
- Joe Sudbay, Washington, DC
- Chris Ryan, Paris, France
- A.J. (Alex) Rossmiller, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Jacki Schechner, Washington, DC
- Cliff Schecter, Somewhere in Ohio

This page is powered by Blogger.
Copyright 2008 - John Aravosis