Washington Post refuses to write even one word about House ENDA victory yesterday

(Correction: The Post DID write about ENDA today in its print edition, on page 7 in one of those throwaway small blurbs it does for the unimportant stories. Yes, that's better than I thought they did - which was nothing - but the fact that I missed it is kind of my point, they treated it like some insignificant blurb. So I stand corrected, but only kind of.)

Front page story in the NYT print edition. No coverage at all in the Washington Post print edition. And spare us the "the bill's passage came too late in the day" garbage - the NYT covered it just fine. (Then again, the Times decided to go back in time to an age when it was okay for newspapers to refer to being gay as an "alternative lifestyle" - where the hell did that blast from the past come from?)

The Washington Post, it's the new Washington Times.