Another roundup of Bush's Middle East visit

Quack, quack, quack. That said, the Washington Post does a fine job of quoting the always popular John Bolton *and* Ed Gillespie just so we can have both sides of the debate. Nice work, fellows! They even manage to quote one person in the the region who complains about American isolationism. So after seven years of expensive overseas failure and a crashing economy at home, is it OK to just leave such a remark out there without question? It's more a sign of well-founded concern at home and frustration with Bush-specific failures and less a sign of any long term trend. Why has the Post become so lousy?