Okay, I won't weigh in. Curious as to your take, however. Hillary's campaign director is now saying that Obama's outrage over Ferraro's comments is simply a political calculation on the eve of a primary.
"We reject these false, personal and politically calculated attacks on the eve of a primary. This campaign should be about the leadership we need for a better future and these attacks serve only to divide the Democratic Party and the American people."She means she rejects Obama's attacks on Ferraro, not that she rejects Ferraro's comments about Obama (though Hillary has said she doesn't agree with Ferraro). Then Ferraro added the following only moments ago:
Ferraro, too, pushed back in an interview on Fox News Channel's "American Election HQ" moments ago. "David Axelrod who knows me better, should not have gotten this whole campaign going," said Ferraro, accusing the Obama campaign of stoking the controversy. She added: "If in 1984 my name was Gerard Ferraro instead of Geraldine Ferraro, I would never have been the nominee for VP."Hmmm... So she's saying that in the same way that the party picked her to be on the ticket because she's a woman, they've chosen Obama to be on the ticket because he's black. I think. Your thoughts?







