Given back? They bought them, they didn't borrow them - they weren't gifts (or were they?) How do you "give back" clothes that you buy? This doesn't make any sense. Especially since they said the rest of the clothes would be donated to charity, in contrast to those they "gave back." Not to mention, so they kept $100,000 of the clothes? That's frugal? That's better?
In MA Race, Martha Coakley Opposes Health-Care Bill Over Stupak Amendment
-
The conventional wisdom about the Stupak bill among the male-dominated
media: Why won't the women just sit down, shut up and let the men folk do
their po...
36 minutes ago
Main & gay blog